Distribution of Industrial sites being set-up for manufacturing goods under PLI scheme link
Featured Post
Visit arvindagarwal2.blogspot.com for posts from 2017 to 2019
Monday, November 15, 2021
Wednesday, October 13, 2021
Indo-Mediterranean connect via Gulf isolates Pakistan-Turkey nexus
Turkey and Pakistan's history of genocide and current global pariah status
The most telling aspect of Turkey’s and Pakistan’s global isolation is that Arab states that were traditionally friendly to the two countries, particularly Saudi Arabia, are now shifting their relations closer to Greece and India. Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia has been progressing slowly, from medieval ideology to increasingly opening the country to modernity. Due to this shift in ideology, Saudi Arabia is increasingly disengaging from funding extremist groups, something that Pakistan is adamant on maintaining despite chronic social issues in the country that more urgently need attention.
The trade volume between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia was just $3.6 billion in 2019. India and Saudi Arabia in 2019-2020 traded $26.84 billion. Although impressive, it points to the geopolitical direction of Saudi Arabia as it now refuses to be locked into partnerships with only Muslim countries.
As Saudi Arabia has their own tensions with Turkey, particularly over the country’s unapologetic support for the Muslim Brotherhood that threatens many of the monarchies in the Arab Peninsula, it too is finding new partnerships and alliances. In one example, Saudi Arabia recently signed off on a deal for a Patriot missile system to be manned by Greek soldiers to protect vital infrastructure from any Yemeni attacks.
Opposition to Turkey’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood and Pakistan’s regressive ideology that belongs in centuries past has also seen great resistance in Egypt and the UAE, both of whom have strengthened relations with India. It is also worth noting that later this month, India, Egypt and Israel will participate in joint military exercises, the UAE is in a mutual defense pact with Greece, and Cyprus regularly participates in exercises with Greece, Egypt and Israel.
All the countries involved in the proposed India to Mediterranean corridor are already consolidating their relations in the military and economic fields. However, the completion of such a corridor would consolidate these countries into a formal multilateral partnership, thus further isolating the Pakistan-Turkey nexus of aggression.
In this way, such a corridor will create an arc of peace and cooperation, crossing countries of different religions, cultures, ethnic groups and traditions. Such a corridor would be the symbol of tolerance that shows the involved countries taking the right steps towards a prosperous future.
Saturday, July 31, 2021
Railways priorities over the next 3 years
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Where is India heading in Ecommerce? Link
K Ganesh, Founder of GrowthStory talks about Tata Digital's Retail eCommerce venture and more
India's eCommerce is at an early stage and set to grow exponentially. "ECommerce is a global phenomenon which India is catching up with and Covid has only accelerated it. It is several orders of magnitude cheaper to sell online in a vast country like India than to build tens of thousands of stores." Operators can quickly and cheaply scale up to all-India levels and chain stores like Future group are struggling to compete. Tata and Reliance (two Indian mega conglomerates) have entered this sector. They have vast resources, professional competence and prior experience in traditional retail to rely upon.
Tata took the unusual step of buying into growth rather than doing it all within the company. It is paying a premium for loss-making but highly growth-orientated, new-age digital companies. For super apps to be successful, they must satisfy a core purpose that is heavily frequented. This can be chat or messaging, digital payments, daily shopping, commuter ticketing, etc. Tata's stakes in BigBasket [fresh fruit & vegetable shopping] and medicine acquisitions work is in that direction. However, customers will look for great functionality from a super app and not just a good one-off app. I think Reliance's deal for bringing in WhatsApp has the best potential for a super app. [Tata Digital is to go public with an IPO. Retail IPOs including Paytm & Zomato are great for domestic investors as they can share in the emerging boom in new Indian equity.]
Indian eCommerce market is so big that both Flipkart and Amazon are growing tremendously. This is despite Amazon going all out to win market dominance and crush the competition. Amazon and Flipkart use national distribution channels where products can be shipped anywhere from distributed warehouses. Others — DoorDash, BigBasket, Swiggy— use the hyper-local distribution where products are shipped from a nearby traditional store.
"Most products can be delivered by either method. But fresh products like foods, vegetables, restaurant food, etc can only be delivered by hyper-local companies. Hyper-locals compete for neighbourhood by neighbourhood, in city after city. Also, large investments are needed so the hyper-local model is costly and does not work on one national strategy. To meet the challenge of competition, they have to stitch together local strands, build the right culture and hope customers keep coming back!" For example, hyper-locals find it more convenient to use existing stores as warehouses and for delivery. So they co-opt local stores and national chains and run their businesses with smooth digital interfaces.
"To sum it up, there is a great opportunity in the hyper-local. At the national level, Flipkart and Amazon are there and we may see large players like Reliance and Tata that can become big. But for hyper-locals, the field is still fully and completely open. Competition is really not the issue as they are taking share from offline or traditional stores."
Friday, June 4, 2021
What are your thoughts on 20% Ethanol blending target? Is it sustainable? Link
Sabyasachi Majumdar, Vice President of ICRA
"Quite simply if India's entire sugar exports are diverted to ethanol production, the blending target can easily reach 20%!!
"In recent years, new sugarcane varieties have substantially boosted sugarcane production from UP as well as sugar recovery. A surplus of 5m tonnes of sugar is produced every year and exports are being encouraged through incentives. Firstly global demand & supply situation can reduce exports in some years which creates cash flow problems and storage issues. Also beyond a few years – I believe after 2023–, subsidies will have to stop as there are trade rulings barring them. So, Government is looking for alternative uses for sugar.
"Avoiding the surplus is the biggest worry. For example, petrol makes up just 10% of total oil imports, though a lot of the rest is refined and exported. A 20% saving on oil for petrol has a small impact on forex but it does not reduce our dependency on imported oil very much. [Edit: sugarcane juice can be converted to aviation fuel or bio-butane which can be consumed or exported.]
"However, ethanol blending is a massive boost for the sugar industry, as it brings sustainability of quality incomes to farmers and stability of employment in factories along the supply chain. I see it as a game-changer for our industry! Domestic sugar price will rise, but so will production to compensate. Blending norms can be adjusted if there is a deficit sugar year or production falls away due to disease."
Wednesday, May 19, 2021
Progress in Digital payments in India
India ranks as a laggard in technology adoption. Link. Yet in fintech, there has been explosive growth. Starting from 2016, India has gone from nowhere to become the leader in digital payments. In 2020, India processed 25.5 billion real-time online payments. China was at 15.7b, followed by S Korea (6b), Thailand (5.2b) and UK (2.8b). US at 1.2b was ranked 9th!!
India's transaction volume share from real-time, online transactions is expected to grow from 15.6% (in 2020) to 37.1% in 2025 when it will become the most popular method of payment. Other electronic payments (eg cards) will grow from 22.9% to 34.5%. Importantly, paper-based payments which had a considerable 61.4% share in 2020 will shrink to just 28.3%. Encouragement of digital payments and dissuasion of cash & black money =================================================== No doubt, demonetisation (2016-17) and a very strict Covid lockdown (2020) were seminal moments along this journey when electronic payment alternatives became a necessity. It compelled ordinary people to move away for the first time from the cash-in-hand or people-to-people means. The push towards everyday use of digital banking was started post 2014 via Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar and digital benefits transfers (DBT). Towards this end, universal banking enrolment of the poor was started on a mission mode, finger-print reading devices were set up, digital payment systems were developed and India's RuPay debit cards and Kisan Credit card were popularised. Incentives such as free accident cover were given to all. Kisan Credit cards reach out to 25m small farmers & fishermen and offer hassle-free concessional credit worth Rs 2 lakh crore! KCC have high convenience as they are used for giving benefits and operating farming schemes (eg crop insurance). During demonetisation, Govt made cash hoarding illegal and barred cash payments over a certain limit. In 2020, it removed the merchant discount rate or electronic payment charge. There were fines for medium-sized companies (revenues > $7m) that did not accept debit card payments for free. In 2020, it enforced e-invoicing for B2B transactions and e-way bills (freight travel documentation) via GSTN portal & a unique IRN. Various mechanisms were created to clamp down on black money generation. Most significant was the total recast of the indirect tax system via GST legislation (2017) when used alongside invoice matching and powerful data analytics. Other legislations were enacted such as Benami property transactions (2016), undisclosed foreign incomes and assets (2015), unregulated deposit schemes (2019), extension of real-time, centralised reporting of bank transfers (RGTS), RBI supervision over cooperative banks and non-bank financial institutions (2019-2020), digital mapping and registration of land ownership (2020-), etc. Indian remittance tax (2019) at 5% on outgoing remittances from India will identify potential black money sources in India. Tightening of existing FCRA (foreign contribution regulation act) (2020) requires opening of a State Bank of India account where money transactions can be tracked, and unauthorised activities of any sort will revoke FCRA registration. Discretionary spending (i.e. admin expenses) is limited to 20%.
Importance of Digital India =====================
Monday, May 10, 2021
India: It doesn't end with the exclusion of Chinese 5G firms
Reaction of Chinese Embassy Counsellor is amusing and delusional. Can the Chinese be so foolish?
The Chinese Embassy spokesman talks piously about "enhancing mutual trust and cooperation" and "open, fair, just, and non-discriminatory business environment", but as usual they, the Chinese live in a make-believe world. Chinese may choose to ignore it but there is widespread, global consensus for rejection of Chinese role in critical infrastructure. Many influential nations have gone further.
India is working to disengage from Chinese-controlled businesses, joint ventures and supply chains. It has declared that all investments into India will be closely scrutinized so it can weed out Chinese sourced investments. India is not only putting up higher trade barriers on Chinese goods but also blocking Chinese exports routed via third countries like Vietnam, Malaysia and Bangladesh. India has barred Chinese JV firms from participating in public tenders. India is also giving production-linked incentives for setting up Make-in-India supply chains and working with like-minded countries to bring production from China to India.
One can see ground realities getting altered step by step by step! In 2020, India banned Chinese tech firms from operating in India and in 2021, there is another slap on the faces of the Chinese.
The exclusion of Chinese firms in India’s 5G trials, as well as in future rollouts, was a future foretold. To imagine that India will open its most sensitive sector to intrusion from the Chinese Communist Party even as its People’s Liberation Army attempts to grab Indian territory is strategic hubris on Beijing’s part. To view India as its competitor is one thing; to bludgeon that idea into military action takes all discussions and negotiations beyond the pale of civil talks. Here, clubs and fists, tactics and manoeuvres are doing the talking. The only solution is for China to get out. To demand, or even expecting business as usual in these times is like China saying: Use Chinese firms, allow them to intrude into your countries, or else!
Those threats have gone past their use-by date. Xi Jinping wants to be feared by the rest of the world. It worked for a while. But now, even that fear is abating in direct proportion to his illusions of grandeur. Philippines Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Teddy Locsin Jr., articulated this in a 3 May 2021 tweet: “China, my friend, how politely can I put it? Let me see… O…GET THE F**K OUT. What are you doing to our friendship? You. Not us. We’re trying. You. You’re like an ugly oaf forcing your attentions on a handsome guy who wants to be a friend; not to father a Chinese province …” These pushbacks will increase. And with them Beijing and the grand supremacy of the Middle Kingdom will turn into a meme.
In its confused state of mind, which in turn is in a state of war within and itching to express it somewhere…anywhere…it seems the CCP has lost its ability to think. In particular, it is unable to read India. It is behaving as an aggrieved party, as though it is surprised by this policy ricochet of Beijing’s actions. For them, this is a diplomatic misdeed. For the rest of the world, this is the right reaction. For those tracking India’s China policy closely, this is a work in progress, a step in India’s evolving critical infrastructure policy with respect to China.
Critical infrastructure comprises those sectors whose destruction would adversely impact a country’s security, economy or safety. It requires the government to identify risks and vulnerabilities — natural (earthquakes or floods, for instance) or manmade (Chinese intrusion, for instance) — and be prepared for them. It is in this context that the exclusion of Huawei and ZTE from India’s 5G trials needs to be seen. In a line, the exclusion of Chinese firms from India’s 5G is a policy that can be informally called, No China 3.0. So far, there are three series of No China policy initiatives.
Series 1
No China 1.0 happened on 29 June 2020, when India banned 59 Chinese apps.
No China 1.1 happened on 28 July 2020, when it banned another 47 Chinese apps.
No China 1.2 happened on 2 September 2020, when India banned another 118 apps.
No China 1.3 happened on 24 November 2020, when it banned another 43 apps.
Series 2
No China 2.0 happened on 2 June 2020, when India banned Chinese firms from participating in highway projects.
Series 3.
No China 3.0 happened on 4 May 2021, with the exclusion of Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE from India’s 5G trials.
But this is not the end. There will be a Series 4, a Series 5, a Series 6…7…8… All of them will ensure No China in India’s critical infrastructure. These policy initiatives will have a four-part drafting. First, around physical critical infrastructure — that is, No China in India’s ports, energy, railways and defence sectors. Second, around virtual critical infrastructure — No China in India’s information technology, internet, broadband sectors. Third, around systemic critical infrastructure — No China in India’s banking and finance sectors. And fourth, around other areas of critical infrastructure — No China in India’s space and nuclear sectors; and emanating from the “Wuhan Virus”, the most important today: No China in India’s public health.
The exclusion of Huawei is, therefore, is subset of a larger policy stream. It is a work in progress, a continuum, with which India will protect its strategic sectors from assault by the CCP-PLA combine that has repeatedly made clear that it does not want India as a friend but considers it an enemy, a threat, an idea it fears and one that it seeks to end.
India is not alone in designing these policies. Given that China is in a state of war, first with itself within and therefore outside, we need to know the tools of tomorrow’s warfare. They will be fought not so much on ground or at sea as they will be in virtual spaces. Or, let’s say, the virtual will drive the physical — the tail has become larger than the dog and is wagging. The looming Cold War will, as Samir Saran articulates, really be a Code War:
With nearly all social, economic, and strategic interactions moving to the virtual and digital realm, states will race to “encode” their political values and technology standards into the algorithms and infrastructure that will govern our societies. This will certainly be a competitive process which will give birth to a persistent “code war”.
What makes Chinese companies entering India’s critical infrastructure dangerous are two outcomes. First, the intrusive nature of 5G technology. And second, China’s National Intelligence Law, Articles 7, 9, 12 and 14, of which turns every Chinese company and every Chinese citizen into a spy. This makes consumers, businesses and governments of all countries that use Chinese equipment vulnerable to intrusion by CCP and PLA.
That’s the reason why Australia banned Chinese firms from its critical infrastructure in August 2019, the UK banned Huawei in July 2020, the US in August 2020, and most of EU including Poland, Estonia, Romania, Denmark, Latvia, and Greece last year. India excluding Huawei from its 5G trials is a step in the same direction. And though the decision is independent, the alignment is clearly with the West.
That said, even if the rest of the world did not ban Huawei or Chinese firms, India must. If there is a collision with China, other countries are at a reasonable geographic distance to negotiate it. With India, there is a 3,488 km long border. India cannot, must not and will not allow Chinese intrusion into its critical infrastructure. There is too much at stake for India, and through India, for rest of the world. So, expect more such exclusions or bans, as one critical sector after another shuts doors to this party, the CCP, that’s visibly and irreversibly turning China into a rogue nation.
Friday, May 7, 2021
|
|
|
|
Rice |
39.43 |
33.82 |
16.6 |
Pulses |
17.75 |
6.45 |
175.2 |
Oilseeds |
10.74 |
9.03 |
18.9 |
Coarse Grains |
12.11 |
11.37 |
6.5 |
Total |
80.03 |
60.67 |
31.9 |
Thursday, April 22, 2021




